CITs Decision on Section 301 China Tariffs
…301 tariffs covering virtually all trade from China. CIT held that USTR acted within its authority to impose the tariffs but sent the tariff actions back after finding the lack…
…301 tariffs covering virtually all trade from China. CIT held that USTR acted within its authority to impose the tariffs but sent the tariff actions back after finding the lack…
…April 10, 2023, aluminum articles from other countries that used any aluminum from Russia will also be tariffed at 200%, unless those third countries also impose tariffs on imported Russian…
…(CBP) has released multiple resources for companies seeking to comply with the UFLPA and Section 307 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1307). CBP released additional guidance on…
…Civil Violations Maximum civil monetary penalties for violations of the Export Controls Act of 2018 from $328,121to $353,534. Effective January 15, 2023. AES Filings 13 U.S.C. 304, Collection of Foreign…
…classification services to avoid blanket classifications that can lead to costly errors like this. While providing the various rates of duty and free trade potentials, we also provide logic to…
The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) has announced the extension of Section 301 China tariff exclusions for 352 products. The original date that the extension was set to…
…program, the agency said. The guidelines include the following: Management Commitment DDTC Registration, Jurisdiction and Classification, Authorizations, and Other ITAR Activities Recordkeeping Reporting and Addressing Violations International Traffic in Arms…
…that includes the specific Schedule B numbers and Harmonized Tariff Schedule codes of the newly restricted items. These items previously didn’t require a license for “most exports” to Russia. Financial…
…2018 from $308,901 to $328,121. The rule is effective as of January 15. AES filings 13 U.S.C. 304, Collection of Foreign Trade Statistics (2002); each day’s delinquency of a violation:…
…Section 301 tariffs because the government was responding to retaliatory tariffs from China. However, the court sent the matter back to the USTR by ruling that the agency failed to…
© 2024 Mohawk Global OTI No. 003952NF Terms of Use Privacy Policy